
  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Fire Path</title>
      <link>https://www.fire-path.app/blog</link>
      <description>Use practical FIRE guides and a scenario-based calculator to compare assumptions and build a resilient path to financial freedom.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <managingEditor>support@ascend-spark.com (Fire Path Team)</managingEditor>
      <webMaster>support@ascend-spark.com (Fire Path Team)</webMaster>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <atom:link href="https://www.fire-path.app/tags/費用率/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
      
  <item>
    <guid>https://www.fire-path.app/zh-TW/blog/etf-cost-01-vs-05-20-year-fire-gap</guid>
    <title>ETF 成本 0.1% vs 0.5% 對 20 年時程的差距</title>
    <link>https://www.fire-path.app/zh-TW/blog/etf-cost-01-vs-05-20-year-fire-gap</link>
    <description>ETF 費用率從 0.1% 到 0.5% 看起來只差 0.4%，但對 20 年 FIRE 時程而言，它會年年降低複利基礎。本文用台灣家庭情境示範如何把 ETF 成本放進 FIRE 模型。</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <author>support@ascend-spark.com (Fire Path Team)</author>
    <category>fire</category><category>ETF</category><category>費用率</category><category>複利</category><category>淨報酬</category>
  </item>

    </channel>
  </rss>
